...she offers the original, bracing definition of her subject only to abandon it ... She starts with monstrousness in the artist’s life but guides us toward monstrousness in the artist’s work. That monstrousness has often found form in art involving the body, especially those parts of it that are typically hidden — corporeal versions of what anthropologists call 'matter out of place' ... Elkin is such a nimble writer that it took me a while to realize I was losing the thread. Her readings of art are attentive and vivid. But by dispensing with the original definition of the art monster — dedicated to art to the exclusion of all else — Elkin also saps it of its power. She moves so far afield that even her early focus on the body recedes from view ... in a book about 'art monsters,' however defined, deciding that monstrosity lies in something as unobjectionable as 'the surprise of the work' is playing it safe ... For all Elkin’s formidable range as a critic, Art Monsters still contains traces of that careful, tentative person; the text is filled with caveats and asides betraying an anxiety that someone might read her or her book the wrong way.
Read Full Review >>