If she was driven by high-minded — and possibly prescient — ideals about protecting democracy, why does Winner bog her narrative down with what seem like attempts at explanatory, or perhaps even in her mind exculpatory, reasons for the less-than-logical planning and execution of her crime? ... Her efforts to support her personal disillusionment with informed sourcing make parts of the book read like a compilation of college essays, replete with dutiful quotes from authoritative voices ... Winner’s prose lacks the verbal virtuosity and nervy wit that seems to flow so readily when she speaks. This first-time author could have done with more editorial guidance. More show, less tell.
Read Full Review >>