That the book fails to properly explore any of these ideas is a major shortcoming. Indeed, Norlin spends so long on backstories for the Colony’s individual members and their practical motives for seeking isolation that there’s not only less space but less narrative necessity for them to share a philosophy ... The low intensity of dialogue and debate is baffling, especially given the early signs of discontent that Norlin carefully plants ... If only the whole story had been told from Låke’s curious and blinkered perspective, The Colony might have ended up more show than tell, and the more eloquent for it. As it stands, the characterization is thin, the motivations are overdetermined, and the Colony’s endurance demands too steep a suspense of disbelief.
Read Full Review >>